1980 in United States Case Law - United States V. Payner, Vance V. Terrazas, Pruneyard Shopping Center V. Robins (Paperback)

Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online. Pages: 33. Chapters: United States v. Payner, Vance v. Terrazas, Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins, United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, Ruiz v. Estelle, Pevsner v. Commissioner, Fricke v. Lynch, Diamond v. Chakrabarty, Industrial Union Department v. American Petroleum Institute, Harris v. McRae, Agins v. City of Tiburon, Dennis v. Sparks, California Retail Liquor Dealers Association v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission, Rhode Island v. Innis, Ohio v. Roberts, Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better Environment, Timberlake v. the State, Fullilove v. Klutznick, Colorado v. Bannister, Mobile v. Bolden, Zaninovich v. Commissioner, Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Payton v. New York, List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 444, List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 449, List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 446, Sibla v. Commissioner, Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Service Commission, Beck v. Alabama, List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 445, List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 448, Jenkins v. Anderson, Rummel v. Estelle, Chiarella v. United States, Owen v. City of Independence, Stone v. Graham, Adams v. Texas, Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Houston v. State, People v. Aaron. Excerpt: United States v. Payner, (1980), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court reversing a district's court's suppression of evidence in the criminal prosecution of an Ohio businessman charged with tax evasion. The case concerned both issues of criminal procedure and the application of the exclusionary rule derived from the Fourth Amendment. By a 6-3 margin the Court both reaffirmed its earlier rulings holding that only the...