Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online. Pages: 27. Chapters: Teo Soh Lung v. Minister for Home Affairs, Factortame litigation, Soering v United Kingdom, R. v. Tutton, Tremblay v. Daigle, United States of America v. Cotroni, R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Northumbria Police Authority, Smith v Eric S Bush, Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls Ltd, Borowski v. Canada, Irwin Toy Ltd. v. Quebec, Improver v Remington, Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia, General Motors of Canada Ltd. v. City National Leasing, Mackeigan v. Hickman, Gaskin v United Kingdom, Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd, Janzen v. Platy Enterprises Ltd., The Aramis, Sobeys Stores Ltd. v. Yeomans and Labour Standards Tribunal, Hunter Engineering Co. v. Syncrude Canada Ltd., R. v. Turpin, Slaight Communications Inc. v. Davidson, Black v. Law Society of Alberta, Brooks v. Canada Safeway Ltd., Royal Trust Bank v Buchler, Tetreault-Gadoury v. Canada, Edmonton Journal v. Alberta. Excerpt: Teo Soh Lung v. Minister for Home Affairs is the name of two cases of the Singapore courts, a High Court decision delivered in 1989 and the 1990 judgment in the appeal from that decision to the Court of Appeal. The cases were concerned with the constitutionality of amendments made to the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore and the Internal Security Act ("ISA") in 1989. The latter statute authorizes detention without trial on security grounds. These amendments had the effect of changing the law on judicial review of executive discretion under the ISA by re-establishing the subjective test enunciated in the 1971 High Court decision Lee Mau Seng v. Minister for Home Affairs which had been overruled in 1988 by Chng Suan Tze v. Minister for Home Affairs, and limiting the right of judicial review to ensuring compliance with procedures specified in the ISA. In other words, the ...