Environmental Administrative Decisions Volume 5; Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1994-01 Excerpt: ...statement. Accordingly, National could have made provision contractually for Tejon's participation in the application process. If it was unable to reach an appropriate accord with Tejon, that failure rather than any regulatory barrier constitutes the real reason for having the permit application denied. Under the circumstances, National cannot be heard to complain about Tejon's supposed "dilemma." Any unwillingness or inability on the part of Tejon to furnish the requisite certification is the direct result of the failure of National and Tejon to structure their relationship such that Tejon was in a position to (and, in fact, mandated to) take part in the application process so as to allow it to submit the necessary certification. For all the foregoing reasons, we are not persuaded that the plain, unambiguous language of section 270.11(d) can be read so as to relieve an absentee landowner of the obligation to sign a certification statement.17 The language of the regulation, the history of the regula 16This is because the same problem arose in the permit proceedings involving Systech, National's hazardous waste fuel supplier. Systech's facility is also located on land owned by Tejon under a sublease from National. On April 29, 1991, the Agency sent Systech an NOD citing the lack of Tejon's signature and certification as a deficiency in Systech's application. (Before the State of California became authorized to administer its own RCRA program, the Agency had begun to process Systech's application for a RCRA permit.) In the fall of 1991, at the request of Systech, the Region's representatives met with representatives from Systech, National and Tejon to discuss the NOD. At that time, the Region agreed to consider the possibility of accepting altern...

R1,269

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles12690
Mobicred@R119pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1994-01 Excerpt: ...statement. Accordingly, National could have made provision contractually for Tejon's participation in the application process. If it was unable to reach an appropriate accord with Tejon, that failure rather than any regulatory barrier constitutes the real reason for having the permit application denied. Under the circumstances, National cannot be heard to complain about Tejon's supposed "dilemma." Any unwillingness or inability on the part of Tejon to furnish the requisite certification is the direct result of the failure of National and Tejon to structure their relationship such that Tejon was in a position to (and, in fact, mandated to) take part in the application process so as to allow it to submit the necessary certification. For all the foregoing reasons, we are not persuaded that the plain, unambiguous language of section 270.11(d) can be read so as to relieve an absentee landowner of the obligation to sign a certification statement.17 The language of the regulation, the history of the regula 16This is because the same problem arose in the permit proceedings involving Systech, National's hazardous waste fuel supplier. Systech's facility is also located on land owned by Tejon under a sublease from National. On April 29, 1991, the Agency sent Systech an NOD citing the lack of Tejon's signature and certification as a deficiency in Systech's application. (Before the State of California became authorized to administer its own RCRA program, the Agency had begun to process Systech's application for a RCRA permit.) In the fall of 1991, at the request of Systech, the Region's representatives met with representatives from Systech, National and Tejon to discuss the NOD. At that time, the Region agreed to consider the possibility of accepting altern...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

May 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

May 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 21mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

406

ISBN-13

978-1-231-12341-6

Barcode

9781231123416

Categories

LSN

1-231-12341-9



Trending On Loot