Interstate Commerce Commission Reports Volume 22; Reports and Decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission of the United States (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1912 Excerpt: ... transit," as that phrase is commonly understood. It seems that all of the delivering carriers were ready to make deliveries to the Illinois Central as soon as that carrier would receive the shipments, but due to the number of cars arriving and the limited capacity of complainant's siding, the Illinois Central, several times during the period in question, found that the cars were becoming congested in its yards and were considerably in excess of complainant's ability to unload. To prevent this it was its custom to issue an embargo against cars consigned to complainant. In all, notices of four such embargoes were issued. Of the duration of these several embargoes we are not advised, and none of the defendant's witnesses could enlighten us. It is of record, however, that the embargoes were of temporary duration and that as soon as the congestion was relieved the embargo was, in each such instance, raised by telephonic netice to the delivering carriers, and more cars were then received from them. All of the demurrage accrued while the cars were being held by delivering lines awaiting acceptance by the Illinois Central, and the charges were apportioned as follows: Texas & Pacific, $556; Louisiana Railway & Navigation Company, $6; Louisville & Nashville, $17; and New Orleans & Northeastern, $28. The petition specifically states that the delay "was entirely due to the failure from time to time of the Illinois Central Railroad Company to place the cars for unloading in reasonable proportion to the capacity of complainant's switch." This averment was reiterated at the hearing, and from the facts disclosed we are of opinion that none of the other delivering lines was at fault. The remaining question is whether or not the Illinois Centr...

R1,011

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles10110
Mobicred@R95pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1912 Excerpt: ... transit," as that phrase is commonly understood. It seems that all of the delivering carriers were ready to make deliveries to the Illinois Central as soon as that carrier would receive the shipments, but due to the number of cars arriving and the limited capacity of complainant's siding, the Illinois Central, several times during the period in question, found that the cars were becoming congested in its yards and were considerably in excess of complainant's ability to unload. To prevent this it was its custom to issue an embargo against cars consigned to complainant. In all, notices of four such embargoes were issued. Of the duration of these several embargoes we are not advised, and none of the defendant's witnesses could enlighten us. It is of record, however, that the embargoes were of temporary duration and that as soon as the congestion was relieved the embargo was, in each such instance, raised by telephonic netice to the delivering carriers, and more cars were then received from them. All of the demurrage accrued while the cars were being held by delivering lines awaiting acceptance by the Illinois Central, and the charges were apportioned as follows: Texas & Pacific, $556; Louisiana Railway & Navigation Company, $6; Louisville & Nashville, $17; and New Orleans & Northeastern, $28. The petition specifically states that the delay "was entirely due to the failure from time to time of the Illinois Central Railroad Company to place the cars for unloading in reasonable proportion to the capacity of complainant's switch." This averment was reiterated at the hearing, and from the facts disclosed we are of opinion that none of the other delivering lines was at fault. The remaining question is whether or not the Illinois Centr...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

March 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

March 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 16mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

300

ISBN-13

978-1-130-81444-6

Barcode

9781130814446

Categories

LSN

1-130-81444-0



Trending On Loot