Decisions of the First Comptroller in the Department of the Treasury (Volume 3) (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1882. Excerpt: ... 484; Louisiana vs. Wood, 102 TT. S., 298; State vs. Delafield, 8 Paige, 527; S. C, 2 Hill, 159; S. C, 26 Wend., 238; Jones' Case, 11 Court CI., 734; see Campbell vs. Dist. Columbia, 2 MacArthur, 537.) Congress alone can create a public liability when there has been no authority given by law to make a contract. (Delafield vs. State of Illinois, 2 Hill, N. T., 160.) 2. The maxim cited in 10 Opinions, page 423, --Fieri non debet, sea"factum valet: --It ought not to be done, but when done it is valid, has no application here. (5 Coke, 39; 1 Strange, 526; 19 Johns., N. Y., 84, 92; 12 Id., 11, 376.) This maxim applies as between private persons whose acceptance of work may operate as a ratification of a previous informal contract or by way of estoppel, or raise a new implied contract. (Lyon vs. Bertram, 20 How., 149; Emerson vs. Slater, 19 How., 224;. s. c, 22 How., 28; Swain vs. Seamaus, 9 Wall., 254; Marsh vs. Fulton County, 10 Wall., 676; Bronson rs. Chappell, 12 Wall., 681; Burroughs on Public Securities, 508; Louisiana vs. Wood, 102 TJ. S., 298.) But when, as in this case, a contract has been made without authority, the attempt to ratify it, or bind the United States by an acceptance of the work done, would be equally without authority. A ratification can only be made by an officer having power to make the contract in the form required for the original contract. Some statutory requirements must "precede the reception of the material." (McDonald vs. Mayor, 68 New York, 26.) In Marsh vs. Fulton County (10 Wallace, 676), it appeared that county bonds had been issued without authority, and it was claimed that they had been ratified by the supervisors of the county. The court said: "The supervisors possessed no authority to issue the bonds without the previ...

R812

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles8120
Mobicred@R76pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1882. Excerpt: ... 484; Louisiana vs. Wood, 102 TT. S., 298; State vs. Delafield, 8 Paige, 527; S. C, 2 Hill, 159; S. C, 26 Wend., 238; Jones' Case, 11 Court CI., 734; see Campbell vs. Dist. Columbia, 2 MacArthur, 537.) Congress alone can create a public liability when there has been no authority given by law to make a contract. (Delafield vs. State of Illinois, 2 Hill, N. T., 160.) 2. The maxim cited in 10 Opinions, page 423, --Fieri non debet, sea"factum valet: --It ought not to be done, but when done it is valid, has no application here. (5 Coke, 39; 1 Strange, 526; 19 Johns., N. Y., 84, 92; 12 Id., 11, 376.) This maxim applies as between private persons whose acceptance of work may operate as a ratification of a previous informal contract or by way of estoppel, or raise a new implied contract. (Lyon vs. Bertram, 20 How., 149; Emerson vs. Slater, 19 How., 224;. s. c, 22 How., 28; Swain vs. Seamaus, 9 Wall., 254; Marsh vs. Fulton County, 10 Wall., 676; Bronson rs. Chappell, 12 Wall., 681; Burroughs on Public Securities, 508; Louisiana vs. Wood, 102 TJ. S., 298.) But when, as in this case, a contract has been made without authority, the attempt to ratify it, or bind the United States by an acceptance of the work done, would be equally without authority. A ratification can only be made by an officer having power to make the contract in the form required for the original contract. Some statutory requirements must "precede the reception of the material." (McDonald vs. Mayor, 68 New York, 26.) In Marsh vs. Fulton County (10 Wallace, 676), it appeared that county bonds had been issued without authority, and it was claimed that they had been ratified by the supervisors of the county. The court said: "The supervisors possessed no authority to issue the bonds without the previ...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

General Books LLC

Country of origin

United States

Release date

February 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

February 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 17mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

324

ISBN-13

978-1-154-15797-0

Barcode

9781154157970

Categories

LSN

1-154-15797-0



Trending On Loot