This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated.1911 Excerpt: ... Could not be done instantaneously without causing a famine. Chicago method seems most feasible. (Straus Laboratory, Washington, D. C.) It would have that tendency. (John Thomas, Ednor, Md., president Milk Producers Association.) Partially so. To what extent is problematical. (Sharon Dairy, District of Columbia.) We think that the insistence upon all these requirements would result in more than a temporary milk famine, and, while of course it would not be probably permanent, it would extend over a considerable period of time; this famine of course being entirely dependent upon what price the consumer was willing to pay. (Borden's Condensed Milk Co., New York, N. Y.) Yes; but for what length of time it is impossible to estimate. (WalkerGordon Laboratory, Washington, D. C.) No. (Dr. V. C. Vaughan, Ann Arbor, Mich.) It would doubtless mean reduced production. (Dr. S. C. Prescott, Boston, Mass.) If any famine, it will be slight and only temporary. (Health officer Los Angeles, Cal.) Insistence upon the testing of the cows may, too low a bacterial count may, but temperature and pasteurization will not cause a temporary milk famine. None will cause a permanent milk famine. (J. M. Houston, White Cross Milk Co., Washington. D. C.) Consumer could not afford milk. (Health officer San Francisco, Cal.) If famine resulted at all, it would only be a question of a short time until the supply would adjust itself to meet the demand. (Health officer St. Joseph, Mo.) I think not. (Health officer Wheeling. W. Va.) No; unless the producers and dealers combine to create it. The chance of such a famine would be lessened by requiring the same standards for milk used for making butter. (Dr. Samuel McC. Hamill, Philadelphia, Pa.) It might. (Health officer Scranton, Pa.) Question 7.--T...