Revised Edition of White's Penal Code, Embracing All Penal Legislation Down to and Including the Acts of the Legislature of 1915, Annotated in Cyclopedic Style to Include the Latest Criminal Reports, and Southwestern Reporter, Volume 1 (Paperback)

, ,
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1916 edition. Excerpt: ... See Introductory Chap., Forms 1 and 2, and follow indictment in Art. 401 down to asterisk, and allege did then and there unlawfully keep and run, and was then and there interested in keeping and running, a Blind Tiger for the purpose of selling intoxicating liquor, and he did then and there unlawfully sell to Richard Roe one drink or one pint, or one bottle, as the case may be of whiskey or other intoxicating liquors, as the ease may be. Conclusion and signature. See Introductory Chap., Form 9. B. Allegation. (a) Keeping blind tiger, and selling intoxicating liquors. The allegation that defendant kept a blind tiger, without further description, is sufficient, and the allegation that he sold intoxicating liquors does not make the indictment duplicitous. Segars v. St., 35 T. Cr. 45 (31 S. V. 370). (b) Local option and election. That a local option election had been held in the prohibited district; that the county commissioners court had declared the result, and that publication was made to put the same in force, must be alleged. Hall v. St., 3' T. Cr. 219 (39 S. ." 117), following Stewart v. St., 35 T. Cr. 391 (33 S. W. 1081). (c) Name of seller and purchaser must be alleged, or if the name of seller is unknown, that fact should be stated. Segars v. St., 40 T. Cr. 577 (51 S. W. 211). 2. Construction and elements. The accused who ran the blind tiger is liable for sale of intoxicating liquors made with his knowledge or assent, whether he made the sale or not. Segars v. St., 40 T. Cr. 577 (51 S. '. 211). Art, 406a. Drinking at storage house prohibited. If any person, firm or association of persons, agent or eniploye of any person, firm or association of persons who are engaged in the business or...

R756

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles7560
Mobicred@R71pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1916 edition. Excerpt: ... See Introductory Chap., Forms 1 and 2, and follow indictment in Art. 401 down to asterisk, and allege did then and there unlawfully keep and run, and was then and there interested in keeping and running, a Blind Tiger for the purpose of selling intoxicating liquor, and he did then and there unlawfully sell to Richard Roe one drink or one pint, or one bottle, as the case may be of whiskey or other intoxicating liquors, as the ease may be. Conclusion and signature. See Introductory Chap., Form 9. B. Allegation. (a) Keeping blind tiger, and selling intoxicating liquors. The allegation that defendant kept a blind tiger, without further description, is sufficient, and the allegation that he sold intoxicating liquors does not make the indictment duplicitous. Segars v. St., 35 T. Cr. 45 (31 S. V. 370). (b) Local option and election. That a local option election had been held in the prohibited district; that the county commissioners court had declared the result, and that publication was made to put the same in force, must be alleged. Hall v. St., 3' T. Cr. 219 (39 S. ." 117), following Stewart v. St., 35 T. Cr. 391 (33 S. W. 1081). (c) Name of seller and purchaser must be alleged, or if the name of seller is unknown, that fact should be stated. Segars v. St., 40 T. Cr. 577 (51 S. W. 211). 2. Construction and elements. The accused who ran the blind tiger is liable for sale of intoxicating liquors made with his knowledge or assent, whether he made the sale or not. Segars v. St., 40 T. Cr. 577 (51 S. '. 211). Art, 406a. Drinking at storage house prohibited. If any person, firm or association of persons, agent or eniploye of any person, firm or association of persons who are engaged in the business or...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

2013

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

2013

Authors

, ,

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 25mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

488

ISBN-13

978-1-234-25001-0

Barcode

9781234250010

Categories

LSN

1-234-25001-2



Trending On Loot