Reports of Cases Decided in the Court of Appeals of the State of New York Volume 201 (Paperback)

,
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1911 edition. Excerpt: ... (People v. U. de D. R. It'. Co., 128 N. Y. 240; People v. A. cf.' V. R. R. Co., 24 N. Y. 261; Dusenbury v. N. Y. lV. (Q C. T. Co., 46 App. Div. 267; N. O. G. L. Co. v. L. L. C0., 115 U. S. 650; Cityof illorristown v. E. T. Tel. C0., 115 Fed. Rep. 304; N. Tel. Co. v. City of Fremont, 99 N. W. Rep. 811; /Steward v. Vil. of Ashtabula, 98 Fed. Rep. 516; Africa v. Bd. of Aldermen, 70 Fed. Rep. 729; Foster v. City of Joliet, 27 Fed. Rep. 899.) The grant by the state accepted by the Lines Company is protected by the constitutional guaranties, and the resolution of the board of estimate and apportionment of April, 1906, was a nullity. (lllayor, ete., v. S. A. R. R. Co., 32 N. Y. 261; N., ete., R. Co. v. IL, ete., R. Co., 102 Va. 795; Fletcfier v. Peak, 6 Oranch, 87; Brgfet v. G. W. R. R. Co., 25 Ill. 310.) The Lines Company has fulfilled every requirement of its charter and every condition of its franchise, and on the merits has not been guilty of nonuser or laches. (People v. R. T. C0., 23 Wend. 222; S._T. cf: T. Co. v. Kearney, 68 App. Div. 283.) Aleacander S. Bacon, Charles 'L. lVYlhrow and Arthur N. Taylor for Great Eastern Telephone Company, intervening. The efiect of the acts of 1885 and 1886, in exercise of the police powers of the legislature, was merely to modify or regulate the relator's franchise, not to destroy or impair. it. (People ea; rel. lV00d/raven v. Deehan, 153 N. Y. 528; J. C., ete., Ry. Co. v. Passaic, 68 N. J. L. 110.) The relator's secondary franchise constitutes property. (People v. 0'Brz'en, 111 N. Y. 1, People em rel. the legislature. (City (fZVew York v. Bryan, 196 N. Y. i 158; S. R. T. Co. v.llayor, eto., 128 N. Y. 510.) A secondary franchise cannot be revoked by the board of..."

R704

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles7040
Mobicred@R66pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1911 edition. Excerpt: ... (People v. U. de D. R. It'. Co., 128 N. Y. 240; People v. A. cf.' V. R. R. Co., 24 N. Y. 261; Dusenbury v. N. Y. lV. (Q C. T. Co., 46 App. Div. 267; N. O. G. L. Co. v. L. L. C0., 115 U. S. 650; Cityof illorristown v. E. T. Tel. C0., 115 Fed. Rep. 304; N. Tel. Co. v. City of Fremont, 99 N. W. Rep. 811; /Steward v. Vil. of Ashtabula, 98 Fed. Rep. 516; Africa v. Bd. of Aldermen, 70 Fed. Rep. 729; Foster v. City of Joliet, 27 Fed. Rep. 899.) The grant by the state accepted by the Lines Company is protected by the constitutional guaranties, and the resolution of the board of estimate and apportionment of April, 1906, was a nullity. (lllayor, ete., v. S. A. R. R. Co., 32 N. Y. 261; N., ete., R. Co. v. IL, ete., R. Co., 102 Va. 795; Fletcfier v. Peak, 6 Oranch, 87; Brgfet v. G. W. R. R. Co., 25 Ill. 310.) The Lines Company has fulfilled every requirement of its charter and every condition of its franchise, and on the merits has not been guilty of nonuser or laches. (People v. R. T. C0., 23 Wend. 222; S._T. cf: T. Co. v. Kearney, 68 App. Div. 283.) Aleacander S. Bacon, Charles 'L. lVYlhrow and Arthur N. Taylor for Great Eastern Telephone Company, intervening. The efiect of the acts of 1885 and 1886, in exercise of the police powers of the legislature, was merely to modify or regulate the relator's franchise, not to destroy or impair. it. (People ea; rel. lV00d/raven v. Deehan, 153 N. Y. 528; J. C., ete., Ry. Co. v. Passaic, 68 N. J. L. 110.) The relator's secondary franchise constitutes property. (People v. 0'Brz'en, 111 N. Y. 1, People em rel. the legislature. (City (fZVew York v. Bryan, 196 N. Y. i 158; S. R. T. Co. v.llayor, eto., 128 N. Y. 510.) A secondary franchise cannot be revoked by the board of..."

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

May 2014

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

May 2014

Authors

,

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 12mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

916

ISBN-13

978-1-234-26689-9

Barcode

9781234266899

Categories

LSN

1-234-26689-X



Trending On Loot