This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1888 edition. Excerpt: ...date without grace. John W. Moore, the respondent, became surety on said 'note. The note was not paid at maturity. Reed de manded payment, and the Fullers not being able to raise the money without stripping themselves of property necessary to carry on their business, it was agreed between Moore, the surety, and the Fullers, that if they would secure him, he would pay the note, and give them time to make the money. Accordingly, said A. Fuller and Mary A. E. Fuller, his wife, in consideration of Moore's advancing the money to pay Reed and extending the time of payment, executed to Moore a mortgage upon certain real property, which was the separate property of said Mary A. E. Fuller. Moore paid the money to Reed, and took an indorsement of the note. The note remaining unpaid, this suit was brought to foreclose the mortgage, the Fullers having in the mean time become insolvent; The testimony certified up with the transcript clearly establishes the making and acknowledgment of the mortgage to secure Moore, that he gave the Fullers time, from the date of its execution until the commencement of this suit, --nearly six months; that the land mortgaged was the separate property of Mary A. E. Fuller, and that her husband joined her in the execution thereof. The testimony in relation to fraud in procuring the acknowledgment, even if relevant, is wholly insufficient to warrant the conclusion that any improper means were resorted to to induce Mrs. Fuller to execute and acknowledge the mortgage. But it is not relevant, for there is no allegation in the answer of fraud, in relation thereto. It will be found that the certificate of the officer to the acknowledgment of the mortgage deed appears on its face to have been in substantial compliance...